The Mishnah establishes:
- A valid warning may be issued to:
- A fully married woman
- A shomeres yavam (levirate‑bond woman)
- An engaged woman
This is derived from inclusive Torah language.
Despite being warnable:
- An engaged woman and a shomeres yavam do not drink
- Only a fully married woman may undergo the ritual
Warning exists to create financial and legal consequences, even without drinking.
The dispute hinges on verses such as:
- “Under her husband”
One view:
- Excludes engaged women from the entire parabola The other:
- Excludes them only from drinking, but not from warning
The halacha parses Torah language with extreme precision.
In cases where the husband:
- Becomes deaf
- Loses sanity
- Is imprisoned
Beit Din may:
- Issue a warning on his behalf
However:
- The woman still does not drink
- She may lose her ketubah if secluded afterward
The daf underscores:
- The Sotah ritual is not inquisitorial
- It is tightly constrained to prevent abuse of suspicion
One‑sentence takeaway
Sotah 25 teaches that while suspicion may be formally established in broader cases, the drinking ritual itself is reserved for a narrow, carefully guarded set of circumstances.
