
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Recent Q&A
A change of location may be considered an interruption that requires the recitation of a new blessing before continuing to eat or drink. This requirement depends on several factors, including the type of food, the new location, visibility of the original area, intent, group dynamics, and the status of the food being consumed.
Factors Influencing Blessing Repetition:
Several factors influence the necessity of repeating a blessing after changing locations:
- After Blessing Type: The requirement to repeat a blessing is only applicable to foods that have the after blessing of Borei Nefashos, or if one ate less than a Kezayis of a Meiyn Gimel food. However, not if one ate a Kezayis of a Meiyn Gimel food, or even less than a Kezayi of Hamotzi bread if he returns back to his original location.
- New Location and Intent: Even by Bore Nefashos foods, changing from one room to another within a building only requires a new blessing if there was no prior intent to change. However, moving from inside to outside necessitates repeating the blessing even with prior intent.
- Visibility: Even by Borei Nefashos foods, if one can see their original eating area from the new location, they do not need to repeat the blessing.
- Group Dynamics: Even by Borei Nefashos foods, if someone is eating with a group and some members remain in the original location, the blessing does not need to be repeated upon returning to that area. However, if one wishes to continue eating in a new location, a new blessing is required.
- Kevius: Even by Borei Nefashos foods, if one someone establishes themselves to eat or drink a Kevius food (like bread, wine, beer, or coffee) and leaves the area with intent to return, then there is no need to repeat the blessing if they briefly leave and return.
Factor | Condition | Requirement |
After Blessing Type | Borei Nefashos or less than Kezayis of Meiyn Gimel food | Repeat blessing if other conditions met |
After Blessing Type | Kezayis of Meiyn Gimel food or less than Kezayis of Hamotzi bread | No need to repeat blessing if returning to original location |
New Location and Intent | Changing from one room to another without prior intent | Repeat blessing |
New Location and Intent | Moving from inside to outside with prior intent | Repeat blessing |
Visibility | Can see original eating area from new location | No need to repeat blessing |
Group Dynamics | Eating with a group and some members remain in original location | No need to repeat blessing upon returning |
Group Dynamics | Wishes to continue eating in a new location | Repeat blessing |
Kevius | Establishes to eat or drink a Kevius food and leaves with intent to return | No need to repeat blessing if briefly leaves and returns |
Yes. This is correct.
See here for the two opinions on the subject: Admur in Seder 8:6; Luach 2:7; 472:20; 612:15
Yes it does, but only from the aspect of having offspring. Thus, there is no technical Halachic restriction against the couple being ten years apart for example, other than the above aspect of whether or not he/she can have children. Notwithstanding, however, it is not recommended for there to be to much of an age difference despite the Halachic allowance. All in all, Halacha does not dictate prohibition in these matters.
See Michaber and Rama E.H. 2:9
Chassidus Articles
Halacha Articles
Other Articles
From the Rav’s Desk: The Rebbe on girls attending Seminary after high school (Tuesday, 17th Teves)
Post Views: 14 Purchase “From Rav’s Desk” Q&A’s 3 Volumes* Check out our Amazon Sefarim Shop *As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. WhatsApp Telegram Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Sponsor an Article Question: Did the Rebbe ever give a directive for girls out of high school to go
From the Rav’s Desk: Where to Insert Personal Requests in Shema Koleinu (Monday, 9th Teves)
Post Views: 54 Question Where exactly within the blessing of Shema Koleinu should one insert personal requests? I have heard many different opinions: one teacher advised doing so at the conclusion of the blessing, just before the words Baruch Atah Hashem Shomea Tefillah. Another suggested placing them in the middle
From the Rav’s Desk: The Absence of Explicit Kingship (“Malchut”) in the Blessings of Shemoneh Esrei: Explanations and Halachic Perspectives (Tuesday 3rd Teves)
Post Views: 59 Question: I learned that a blessing (berachah) is not considered a valid blessing unless it contains both the Name of Hashem and malchut (kingship), such as the phrase “Hashem, King of the universe.” However, I noticed that in Shemoneh Esrei, none of the blessings explicitly include malchut.
Ask the Rav #5: Chanukah Q&A (Monday, 2nd eves)
Post Views: 69 Ask the Rav: Your Questions – Our Answers A global inbox meets timeless wisdom. Ask the Rav is a series built entirely on authentic questions sent from Jews around the world — from Brooklyn to Be’er Sheva, Melbourne to Manchester. Each question is a real-life dilemma, curiosity,
Ask the Rav #4: Chanukah Q&A (Sunday, 1st Teves)
Post Views: 65 Ask the Rav: Your Questions – Our Answers A global inbox meets timeless wisdom. Ask the Rav is a series built entirely on authentic questions sent from Jews around the world — from Brooklyn to Be’er Sheva, Melbourne to Manchester. Each question is a real-life dilemma, curiosity,
Ask the Rav #3: Chanukah Q&A (Thursday, 28th Kisleiv)
Post Views: 52 Ask the Rav: Your Questions – Our Answers A global inbox meets timeless wisdom. Ask the Rav is a series built entirely on authentic questions sent from Jews around the world — from Brooklyn to Be’er Sheva, Melbourne to Manchester. Each question is a real-life dilemma, curiosity,

Leave A Comment?
You must be logged in to post a comment.