📜 Daily Chumash & Rashi – Parshas Shemini – Chamishi: The goat sin offering is burnt and not eaten (Thursday 22nd Nissan)

*The article below is an excerpt from the above Sefer

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from  qualifying purchases.

Chamishi

  1. The goat sin offering is burnt and not eaten:
    • Moshe discovers the goat offering was not eaten: Moshe questioned why the male goat offering was completely burnt and not eaten. He became angry with Elazar and Isamar, the remaining children of Aaron, asking them why they did not eat the Chatas which was given to atone for the congregation, in a holy area. “Its blood was not entered into the Kodesh, and hence you should have eaten it in the holies as I instructed.”
    • Aaron’s explanation: Aaron replied to Moshe that it is not befitting in the eyes of G-d to eat the offering on a day like this when these tragedies occurred to me [i.e. the death of Nadav and Avihu]. Moshe approved of this response.

📘 Rashi Q&A — Vayikra 10:16–20

10:16 — Moses’ Inquiry

Q1. Which sin‑offering goat is referred to by “שְׂעִיר הַחַטָּאת” according to Rashi?

A: The goat of Rosh Chodesh, one of three sin‑offering goats brought that day.    

 

Q2. What were the three sin‑offering goats brought on that day?

A:

  1. The goat of the installation rites
  2. The goat donated by Nachshon
  3. The goat of Rosh Chodesh

 

Q3. Which of these was burned?

A: Only the goat of Rosh Chodesh.

 

 Q4. Why do the sages say it was burned?

A:

  • Some say because a ritually defiled entity touched it
  • Others say because Aaron and his sons were onenim, and this sacrifice applied to all generations     

 

Q5. Why were the other two goats eaten despite their mourning?

A: Because they were one‑time offerings, and Aaron relied on Moses’ instruction: “eat them as unleavened loaves.”

     

 

 

10:16 — “דָּרֹשׁ דָּרַשׁ                                 

Q6. What does the double phrase “דָּרֹשׁ דָּרַשׁ” indicate?

A: Moses made two inquiries.

 

Q7. What were the two questions Moses asked?

A:

  1. Why was this sin‑offering burned?
  2. Why were the other two eaten?

 

10:16 — Moses’ Anger

Q8. Why does the verse say Moses was angry with Eleazar and Itamar?

A: Out of respect for Aaron, Moses directed his anger toward the sons, though he was mainly upset with Aaron.

 

Q9. What does “לֵאמֹר” mean here according to Rashi?

A:Respond to my questions.

 

10:17 — Why Was It Not Eaten?

Q10. How does Rashi explain Moses’ question about eating “in the holy place”?

A: Moses was asking whether the goat had been taken outside the Courtyard, which would disqualify it.

 

Q11. How did Aaron and his sons answer this concern?

A: They told him it had not been taken outside.

 

Q12. What further question did Moses then ask?

A: If it was not taken outside, why was it not eaten?

 

Q13. What does “לָשֵׂאת אֶת־עֲוֹן הָעֵדָה” teach according to Rashi?

A: That the priests’ eating of the sacrifice brings atonement for the community.

 

Q14. What proof does Rashi give that this goat was the Rosh Chodesh offering?

A: Because it atoned for the sin of the community, unlike the other two goats.

 

10:18 — Blood Not Brought Inside

Q15. What argument does Moses make regarding the blood?

A: Since the blood was not brought into the Sanctuary, the goat should not have been burned.

 

Q16. What does “אָכֹל תֹּאכְלוּ” mean according to Rashi?

A: You should have eaten it, even though you are onenim.

 

Q17. What does “כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוֵּיתִי” refer to?

A: Moses’ earlier instruction regarding eating the grain‑offering while mourning.

 

10:19 — Aaron’s Response

Q18. Why does the verse say “וַיְדַבֵּר אַהֲרֹן”?

A: Because Aaron spoke firmly, though respectfully.

 

Q19. Why did Eleazar and Itamar themselves not answer Moses?

A: Out of respect—a son should not speak in his father’s presence, nor a disciple before his teacher.

 

Q20. How do we know Eleazar was capable of answering?

A: Because elsewhere he does speak in the presence of Moses and the leaders.

 

10:19 — The Core Argument

Q21. What does Aaron mean by “הֵן הַיּוֹם הִקְרִיבוּ”?

A: He was answering Moses’ implied question about officiating while onenim.

 

Q22. What distinction does Aaron make between himself and his sons?

A:

  • Ordinary priests invalidate service if they officiate while onenim
  • The High Priest may officiate while an onen
  •  

Q23. What does “וַתִּקְרֶאנָה אֹתִי כָּאֵלֶּה” mean?

A: Even if the deceased were other close relatives, for whom Aaron would also be obligated to mourn.

 

Q24. What does “הַיּוֹם” emphasize in Aaron’s argument?

A: That the prohibition applies on the day of burial, not the following night.

 

Q25. What is Aaron’s final reasoning?

A: That although one‑time offerings were permitted to be eaten while mourning, offerings prescribed for all generations are not.

 

10:20 — Moses’ Acceptance

Q26. What does “וַיִּיטַב בְּעֵינָיו” mean according to Rashi?

A: Moses accepted Aaron’s reasoning.

 

Q27. What admirable trait does Rashi highlight about Moses here?

A: That he was not ashamed to admit publicly:

I did not hear it.

About The Author

Leave A Comment?

You must be logged in to post a comment.