🗓️ Luach Hayom – Today in Halacha & Jewish History: 4th Iyar

Table of Contents

đź“… Today in Jewish History

📅 Year 5708 (1948) — The Fall of Gush Etzion

In the year 5708, during the final days before the proclamation of the State of Israel, the Gush Etzion bloc—a group of four Jewish settlements located in the Judean Hills south of Jerusalem—fell after months of siege and heroic defense. Established between 1943 and 1947, the settlements of Kfar Etzion, Massu’ot Yitzhak, Ein Tzurim, and Revadim stood in a strategically critical position on the southern approaches to Jerusalem and became a primary target of Arab forces immediately following the UN Partition Plan of November 1947.

From late 1947 onward, Gush Etzion was cut off from Jerusalem, with supply convoys repeatedly ambushed and defenders suffering mounting casualties. Among the most searing episodes was the tragic loss of the “Lamed Hey” (the 35)—Haganah fighters who set out on foot in January 1948 to resupply the bloc and were all killed in battle. Despite overwhelming odds, the defenders—settlers and Haganah/Palmach fighters alike—chose to remain, aware that their steadfast presence tied down large enemy forces and helped prevent their advance toward Jerusalem itself.

The final assault began in mid‑May 1948. On 5–6 Iyar 5708, massive Arab forces, including units of the Arab Legion, attacked Kfar Etzion. After intense fighting and the exhaustion of all defensive means, the defenders surrendered; many were massacred even after laying down their arms, while the remaining residents of the bloc were taken captive. The other settlements fell shortly thereafter and were looted and destroyed, bringing to an end the Jewish presence in the area for the next nineteen years. In total, hundreds of defenders and settlers lost their lives during the defense and fall of Gush Etzion.

The fall of Gush Etzion occurred one day before the declaration of the State of Israel and left an indelible mark on Jewish national memory. Though militarily defeated, its defenders came to be remembered as having sacrificed themselves to protect Jerusalem, a view later expressed publicly by Israel’s leaders. After the Six‑Day War of 1967, Gush Etzion was rebuilt, with survivors and the children of the fallen returning to re‑establish the communities—turning its destruction into a symbol of loss, perseverance, and return.

The Rebbe of Belz

One year after the fall of Gush Etzion, which occurred shortly before Pesach 5708, during the violent attacks of that period, Jewish blood was being spilled throughout the Land of Israel. It is related that the holy Rebbe of Belz refused at that time to renew even a minor item of personal clothing. When urged repeatedly, he responded: “I do not understand you. Is this the time for such matters? Jewish blood is flowing like water in the cities of Judea and in the streets of the Land of Israel—and you occupy yourselves with this?” This response reflected his profound identification with the suffering of the Jewish people.

The Goral HaGra and Rabbi Aryeh Levin used to bury those killed in  battle in Gush Etziyon

In the aftermath of the War of Independence, following the reburial of the fallen fighters of the Convoy of Thirty‑Five (Lamed‑Heh) at Mount Herzl in 1949, a grave halachic and human dilemma arose: twelve of the bodies could not be identified. Due to the severe mutilation of the remains and the loss of the original burial map from Gush Etzion, conventional identification proved impossible. The families of the fallen, seeking closure and proper burial with name and identity, turned in anguish to the rabbinic leadership of Jerusalem.

The matter was brought before Rabbi Tzvi Pesach Frank, Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem, who ruled that under such extraordinary circumstances it would be permissible to employ the rare and sacred method known as the Goral HaGra—a procedure traditionally attributed to the Vilna Gaon, involving opening a Tanach at random and interpreting the verses as Divine guidance. Recognizing both the spiritual gravity and the risk of misuse of such a practice, Rabbi Frank instructed that the goral be performed only by a righteous and exceptionally humble individual, free of personal interest. He therefore asked Rabbi Aryeh Levin, known as the Tzaddik of Jerusalem, to conduct it.

Rabbi Aryeh Levin initially refused, deeply aware of the responsibility and fearful of error. Only after repeated pleas from the bereaved parents, and upon being assured that the goal was solely kavod ha‑met—honoring the dead—did he consent. The ceremony took place late at night, in the modest upstairs room of his Jerusalem home. Twelve candles were lit, Tehillim were recited, and an old Amsterdam‑printed Tanach, with its pages arranged in two columns as required by tradition, was used. Present were only a handful of witnesses, including members of the families and close תלמידי חכמים.

One by one, Rabbi Aryeh opened the Tanach according to the prescribed order of the Goral HaGra. In each instance, verses emerged that were understood—by name, lineage, or unmistakable allusion—to identify a specific fallen soldier. After eleven identities were established in this manner, the twelfth remaining soldier was identified by elimination. Following this, Rabbi Tzvi Pesach Frank ruled that the results could be relied upon halachically, and each soldier was buried under his name, bringing closure to families who had lived for months in uncertainty.

📅 4 Iyar — Yom HaZikaron: Memory, Sanctity, and Gratitude

Yom HaZikaron, observed on 4 Iyar, was established in the early years of the State of Israel as a national day of remembrance for Israel’s fallen soldiers and victims of terror, commemorating those who gave their lives so that the Jewish people might live in security in their land. Beyond a national memorial, the day carries deep spiritual meaning: it recalls Jews who died al kiddush Hashem, in defense of Jewish life and the Jewish future.

When Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Auerbach was asked whether it is necessary to travel abroad to pray at the graves of tzaddikim, he replied that if the journey has meaning for the person, he may go. Yet it is related of Rabbi Shlomo Zalman himself that when traveling from his home in Shaarei Chesed to Yeshivat Kol Torah, he would often pass Mount Herzl, and at times ask the driver to stop so he could pray at the military cemetery, saying: “These are graves of tzaddikim who died sanctifying G‑d’s Name; for this I need not travel far.” This story teaches that honoring the fallen of Israel is not only permitted, but fitting, even for the greatest Torah sages.

In this spirit, the Lubavitcher Rebbe consistently emphasized sensitivity, care, and deep respect toward bereaved families, teaching that their pain belongs to the entire Jewish people. He stressed that gratitude and responsibility toward those who sacrificed their lives are not dependent on religious affiliation or level of observance. Every Jew—yeshiva student and soldier, chassid and secular, ultra‑Orthodox and traditional—is indebted to them, especially those who live and learn in the Land of Israel in peace, able to study Torah and raise children in safety because others stood in harm’s way. Yom HaZikaron thus calls upon all of Israel to remember, to honor, and to recognize this shared obligation with humility and unity.

📅 Today’s Yahrzeits

🕯️ Rabbi Lipa of Sambor

🕯️ Rabbi Yosef Dov HaLevi Soloveitchik (the Beit HaLevi)

👤Their Background[1]

🕯️ Year 5481 (1721) — Passing of Rabbi Lipa of Sambor

Rabbi Lipa of Sambor, son of the holy Rabbi Yitzchak Isaac of Safrin, was among the early disciples of the Baal Shem Tov. He is mentioned with reverence in Toldot Yaakov Yosef (Parashat Kedoshim), where he is eulogized as one who stood as a spiritual shield protecting many thousands of Jews. His life exemplified quiet righteousness, devotion, and self‑sacrifice for the welfare of Israel.

🕯️ 4 Iyar 5652 (1892) — Passing of Rabbi Yosef Dov HaLevi Soloveitchik (the Beit HaLevi)

Rabbi Yosef Dov HaLevi Soloveitchik, known as the Beit HaLevi, was one of the towering figures of nineteenth‑century Jewish scholarship and the founder of the Soloveitchik (Brisker) dynasty. Born in 1805, he combined penetrating halakhic analysis with profound ethical sensitivity, shaping the intellectual character of Lithuanian Torah Judaism.

The Beit HaLevi served as co‑Rosh Yeshivah of Volozhin together with the Netziv (Rabbi Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin), and later as rabbi of Slutsk and finally Brisk (Brest‑Litovsk). His Torah writings—collected under the title Beit HaLevi—span Talmud, halakhah, derashah, and hashkafah, and are noted for their clarity, moral seriousness, and conceptual depth. He was the grandfather of Rabbi Chaim Soloveitchik, developer of the Brisker method.

 

Connection to Chabad

Although rooted firmly in the Lithuanian yeshivah world, the Beit HaLevi had a personal and intellectual relationship with Chabad. His son, Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik, and later descendants interacted with Chabad leaders, and there is documented familiarity between the Soloveitchik and Schneerson families. Most notably, in the next generation, Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik (“the Rav”) met and interacted with Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson in Berlin—an encounter reflecting the mutual respect between these intellectual lineages.

Moreover, Chabad literature frequently cites the Beit HaLevi’s hashkafic depth and uncompromising integrity, recognizing him as a master of Nigleh whose spiritual seriousness complemented Chabad’s inward devotion.

The Beit HaLevi passed away on 4 Iyar 5652 (1892), not long after the closure of the Volozhin Yeshivah, an event that deeply affected him and symbolized the end of an era in Torah life. His legacy continues to shape halakhic reasoning and Torah leadership across the Jewish world.

The First Marriage and Divorce of Rabbi Yosef Ber Soloveitchik (the Beis HaLevi)

During his early years, Rabbi Yosef Ber Soloveitchik, later known as the Beis HaLevi, entered his first marriage through a shidduch arranged while he was still very young (approximately sixteen years old). He married the daughter of a wealthy and influential Chabad philanthropist (“גביר מחסידי חב״ד”) from Bobruisk, and for a time lived in his father‑in‑law’s home. This marriage created a unique setting in which Lithuanian Torah scholarship and Chabad chassidic circles came into close personal contact. ]

At this period, Rabbi Yosef Ber developed a deep personal friendship and chavruta relationship with the Rabbi of Bobruisk, Rabbi Baruch Mordechai Ettinger, spending hours each day in intensive halachic discussion and joint learning, particularly in Choshen Mishpat. Their relationship is described as one of “יחסי ידידות הדוקים”—a close and enduring bond of mutual respect, and Rabbi Baruch Mordechai played a central role both before and during the marriage.

Over time, however, intense jealousy and hostility arose on the part of the wealthy father‑in‑law toward his son‑in‑law. Despite repeated efforts by Rabbi Yosef Ber himself and by Rabbi Baruch Mordechai to intervene and restore peace, the opposition hardened. Eventually, under emotional pressure and to prevent further damage, Rabbi Yosef Ber agreed to grant a divorce, though he did so with great pain and inner reluctance.

The divorce proceedings themselves highlight both the exceptional integrity of Rabbi Yosef Ber and the supportive role of Rabbi Baruch Mordechai. Rabbi Yosef Ber carefully reviewed the get, raising stringent halachic concerns and insisting on a second document to avoid even the slightest doubt. Rabbi Baruch Mordechai defended him before the dayanim, explaining that such caution was entirely appropriate for a Torah scholar of his stature. Despite hopes that the situation might resolve at the last moment, the divorce was ultimately completed.

Rabbi Yosef Ber refused any financial compensation from his former father‑in‑law and left the household taking nothing beyond his personal talit, a decision reflecting his principled character. The episode marked a formative and painful chapter in his life but also reveals his ethical rigor, humility, and the crucial personal support he received from Rabbi Baruch Mordechai of Bobruisk.

 

Kabbalat Ol Mitzvot as the Foundation of Conversion — The Beit HaLevi’s Principle

Rabbi Yosef Dov Soloveitchik (the Beit HaLevi) articulated with great clarity that a Ger (convert) is halachically a ger only if he genuinely accepts the yoke of Torah and mitzvot (kabbalat ol mitzvot), and that immersion and circumcision without this acceptance are insufficient. This position is rooted in the Talmud (Yevamot 47a) and codified in Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh Deah 268, but the Beit HaLevi emphasized that kabbalat mitzvot is not a formality—it is the very essence of entering the covenant of Israel, without which no conversion takes effect. In contemporary practice, this view shapes mainstream Orthodox conversion standards: batei din require demonstrable commitment to halachic observance (Shabbat, kashrut, family purity, and Torah authority) as a prerequisite for conversion, particularly in cases of conversion for marriage or integration into Jewish communal life, reflecting the Beit HaLevi’s insistence that Jewish identity is defined by lived covenantal responsibility, not symbolic ritual alone.

[1] Please not that these historical notes were prepared with the assistance of Copilot Pro, an AI Research Agent, and have not been independently verified.

About The Author