Question:
I gave my tefillin for checking and it came back with a lot of splashed ink on the bottom of the Tefillin? Is it valid? Is this a problem of a Chatzitza?
Answer:
If there is actual substance of ink on the bottom of the tefillin then it should be sanded off using sandpaper, or scratched off using your nails. If there is no substance there but simply a black color of the ink [including if after scratching off the substance of ink the color of the ink still remains], then it is valid. [I would recommend that you inform the Sofer who checked your tefillin of what you have found, and that in the future a more professional job should be done. To note, that if you wore the tefillin in this state prior to removing the ink, then any of the ink removed would need to be put in Geniza.]
Explanation:
A general rule in the laws of Chatzitza is that the mere color of ink is not considered a Chatzitza, and hence certainly the same would apply here regarding the bottom of the Tefillin. Furthermore, regarding black ink on the bottom of the Tefillin one can argue that it is never considered a Chatzitza the same way that is not considered a Chatzitza or addition to the actual Bayis, being that it is done for the sake of beauty, and anything that is done for the sake of beauty to an item is not considered a Chatzitza. Accordingly, some Sefarim even discuss as to why we don’t even initially paint the bottom of the Batim, just as we paint the rest of it, and just as some have the custom of painting also the bottom of the straps, as the concept of Chatzitza does not apply when the ink is applied for beauty purposes. However, in truth, seemingly in our case in which the ink was simply splashed due to sloppy work, and was not intended to be done for the sake of beautifying the tefillin, then perhaps it should be considered a Chatzitza, and hence if there’s any substance of ink it must be removed. Whatever the case, the world custom is not to paint the bottom of the tefillin and hence regardless of whether we consider it a Chatzitza to invalidate the tefillin, it should be removed. To note, there’s a general dispute regarding whether a Chatzitza invalidates the wearing of Tefillin, and the above is written according to the final conclusion that we are stringent in this matter.
Sources: See Chayeh HaLevi 1:7; Piskeiy Teshuvos 27:8 that one is to beware that the bottom surface area of the Tefillin is clear of any Chatzitza, such as stickers paint or ink that has substance, or dirt; See regarding the law of Chatzitza by Tefillin: Admur 27:7; Michaber 27:4; Tur 27; Michaber 27:4; Tur 27 See regarding that the Batim are only painted due to beauty of the mitzvah: Admur 32:60; 33:4; Michaber 32:40; Rosh Tefillin 8; Rambam Tefillin 3:14; See M”B 32:184; Piskeiy Teshuvos 32:65 for further details on this matter; Other opinions: Some Poskim rule that the blackening of the Batim is included in the tradition to Moshe from Sinai, and hence is Biblically required. [See M”B 32:184; Kol Yaakov 32:184-185; Piskeiy Teshuvos ibid]; See regarding that ink is a Chatzitza: Admur 161:5; Michaber Y.D. 198:15; See regarding that mere color of ink is not an invalidating Chatzitza: Admur 161:5; Michaber O.C. 161:15; Y.D. 198:17; Rashba Toras Habayis Haruch 7:7; Rosh Mikvaos 27; Betzel Hachochmah 5:82; Halichos Shlomo 4 Devar Halacha 44; Piskeiy Teshuvos 32:74 See regarding that it is valid even if it has substance if it comes to beautify [or protect the Bayis]: Regarding Netilas Yadayim and Daled Minim: Admur 161:5; 651:4; Michaber 161:2 and 15; 651:7; M”A 161:3; Rashba Toras Habayis Haruch 7:7; Rosh Mikvaos 27; M”A 651:2; Levush 651:1; Sukkah 37a; Levush 651:7; Maharam Shick Y.D. 288 [regarding protection]; Regarding Nida: Michaber Y.D. 198:17; Binas Adam 119:14; Pnei Aryeh 6; Keren Ledavid 45; Taharas Mayim 70:2; Taharah Kehalacha 19:45; Regarding Tefillin: Shevet Halevi 5:14; 8:4; Chut Shani Pesach p. 305; Yabia Omer 1:1-2; Shevet Hakehasi 5:15; Piskeiy Teshuvos 32:74
Other Articles
From the Rav’s Desk – Q&A on Eily, Kerias Hatorah and Kugel
Post Views: 94 Was Eily the Kohen Gadol a descendent from Pinchas? Was Eily the Kohen Gadol a descendent from Pinchas & which family of Aaron merited the High priesthood, Elazar or Itamar? Eily Hakohen was a descendent of Itamar, the brother of Elazar, the father of Pinchas.[1] Initially, the
From the Rav’s Desk – Q&A on Shiva
Post Views: 97 After a fire comes wealth – Hashem blesses those who have fallen The Tzemach Tzedek[1], quoting from the Alter Rebbe in the name of previous Tzadikim, that after a fire [or any other calamity[2]] comes wealth. [In fact, the numerical value of burnt/Saraf in Hebrew is the
From the Rav’s Desk – Q&A on demons and more
Post Views: 149 Is it true that in today’s times demons no longer exist? Is it true that in today’s times demons no longer exist? There is a very well-known saying that the Baal Shem Tov eradicated the demons from the world and therefore there are no longer any demons
From the Rav’s Desk – Q&A on demons, haircuts and more
Post Views: 142 Do demons really exist? Do demons really exist? The Sages[1] mentioned the existence of demons in various places, and they are likewise mentioned in a verse[2] in scripture. It is hence imperative for a G-d fearing Jew who believes in the Torah and in the word of
From the Rav’s Desk – Q&A on Meat and fish & More
Post Views: 124 Why do we avoid eating fish and meat together? Why do we avoid eating fish and meat together?[1] One must beware from eating meat and fish together due to that it can cause leprosy.[2] _____________________________________________________ [1] Michaber Y.D. 116:2; O.C. 173:2 “As it is difficult for Davar
From the Rav’s Desk – Q&A on Birthdays & More
Post Views: 142 Is there any Torah source for celebrating a birthday? Source in the Torah for celebrating a birthday: The Torah makes mention of a birthday celebration in reference to Pharaoh when he celebrated his birthday and requested his imprisoned head baker and vintner to appear before him, as
Leave A Comment?
You must be logged in to post a comment.