- Animals Designated but Disqualified
If a person designates an animal for an offering and:
- The animal becomes blemished or otherwise unfit,
Then:
- Its value remains sanctified
- A replacement animal is brought
- Any surplus value after replacement is classified as mותרות (surplus sanctity)
- The Six “Shofar” Boxes
The Mishnah explains that the Temple had six collection boxes dedicated to surplus funds:
These held:
- Leftover money from designated offerings
- Replacement‑value surpluses
- Excess coins from communal obligations (like overpaid half‑shekels)
All such funds were ultimately used for voluntary burnt offerings when the altar was idle.
- Why So Many Boxes?
Several explanations are suggested:
- Preventing quarrels among priestly families
- Preventing decay of stored coins
- Logical classification of different surplus categories
The Gemara rejects overly speculative rationales and emphasizes:
Practical administration, not symbolism.
- Guiding Principle
Once money is sanctified:
- It never loses sanctity
- Even if its original purpose is no longer viable
Sanctity is redirected, not erased.
One‑sentence takeaway
Menachot 108 teaches that sanctity, once created, must be responsibly redirected—even surplus or failed offerings remain holy and are reintegrated into divine service.